Integration of Function Analysis and Trimming Method: A Systematic Approach for Improving a Spinal Board Design

Hilma Zadry; Lusi Susanti; Gamma  Uswansyaf

doi:10.25077/aijaset.v2i03.55

Authors

Hilma Zadry Universitas Andalas
Lusi Susanti Universitas Andalas
Gamma Uswansyaf Universitas Andalas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/aijaset.v2i03.55

Abstract

Function analysis primarily distinguishes components in a system and explains the function interactions amongst the components' pairs. It assists designers in revealing the main problematic areas (components) and contradictions. The trimming method assists in generating a simple design; thus, it can reduce costs and the number of faults. This study integrated the function analysis and trimming method as a systematic approach to product concept design based on the problem-oriented concept. A spinal board is an evacuation device for patients with an injured spinal cord. A case study of improving a spinal board design is conducted to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach. The study resulted in an alternate design of spinal board with some inventions which deliver improved performance in decreasing injury, increasing comfort and safety, and satisfying the users' requirements.

References

B. Hemmes, “Improving spineboard design evaluation of a new, soft-layered spineboard in trauma care,” Universitaire Pers Maastricht, 2016.

I. Kwan, F. Bunn, and I. Roberts, “Spinal immobilisation for trauma patients.,” Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online), no. 1. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 1–17, 2009.

I. R. Profile and C. Note, “Indonesia ’ S Country Report on Disaster Response Management,” 3rd AIPA Caucus Rep., no. September, pp. 1–12, 2010.

D. Bauer and R. Kowalski, “Effect of spinal immobilization devices on pulmonary function in the healthy, nonsmoking man,” Ann. Emerg. Med., vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 915–918, 1988.

D. Ay, C. Aktas, S. Yesilyurt, S. Sarikaya, A. Cetin, and E. S. Ozdogan, “Effects of spinal immobilization devices on pulmonary function in healthy volunteer individuals,” Turkish J. Trauma Emerg. Surg., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 103–107, 2011.

R. S. Agbeko, S. Pearson, M. J. Peters, J. McNames, and B. Goldstein, “Intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure responses to head elevation changes in pediatric traumatic brain injury,” Pediatr. Crit. Care Med., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. E39–E47, 2012.

D. A. Cross and J. Baskerville, “Comparison of Perceived Pain with Different Immobilization Techniques,” Prehospital Emerg. care, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 270–274, 2001.

M. D. Luscombe and J. L. Williams, “Comparison of a long spinal board and vacuum mattress for spinal immobilisation,” Emerg Med J, vol. 20, pp. 476–478, 2003.

M. E. Lovell and J. H. Evans, “A comparison of the spinal board and the vacuum stretcher, spinal stability and interface pressure,” Inj. Int. J. Care Inj., vol. 25, no. 3, 1994.

R. Schouten, T. Albert, and B. K. Kwon, “The Spine?injured Patient: Initial Assessment and Emergency Treatment,” J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 336–346, 2012.

D. Chan, R. Goldberg, A. Tascone, S. Harmon, and L. Chan, “The effect of spinal immobilization on healthy volunteers,” Ann. Emerg. Med., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 48–51, 1994.

I. Kwan and F. Bunn, “Effects of prehospital spinal immobilization: a systematic review of randomized trials on healthy subjects.,” Prehospital disaster Med. Off. J. Natl. Assoc. EMS Physicians World Assoc. Emerg. Disaster Med. Assoc. with Acute Care Found., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 47–53, 2005.

S. K. Çorbacioglu, S. Akkus, Y. Çevik, E. Akinci, and H. Uzunosmanoglu, “Effect of Spinal Immobilization with a Long Backboard and Cervical Collar on the Vital Signs,” J. Acad. Emerg. Med., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 65–68, 2016.

“Backboard stretcher spine board,” Alibaba.com, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Backboard-stretcher-spine-board-EG-006-_470293836.html?spm=a2700.7724838.2017115.174.bd133fd8P9V4CY. [Accessed: 31-Jul-2019].

H. R. Zadry, D. Rahmayanti, L. Susanti, and D. Fatrias, “Identification of Design Requirements for Ergonomic Long Spinal Board Using Quality Function Deployment (QFD),” Procedia Manuf., vol. 3, no. AHFE, pp. 4673–4680, 2015.

H. R. Zadry, L. Susanti, and D. Rahmayanti, “Ergonomics intervention on an alternative design of a spinal board,” Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 393–403, 2017.

H. R. Zadry, L. Susanti, D. Rahmayanti, and F. Islami, “An Application of Integrated Methodology in the Determination of Ergonomic Product Design Requirement,” Adv. Sci. Lett., vol. 23, no. 5, 2017.

Y. Ko and P. Kuo, “A Trimming Design Method for Product Innovation,” in The 2012 IEEE IEEM, 2012, pp. 1080–1084.

S. Smith, G. Smith, and Y. Shen, “Redesign for product innovation,” Des. Stud., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 160–184, 2012.

H. R. Zadry, L. Susanti, D. Rahmayanti, and F. Islami, “An application of integrated methodology in the determination of ergonomic product design requirement,” Adv. Sci. Lett., vol. 23, no. 5, 2017.

H. R. Zadry, D. Rahmayanti, L. Susanti, and D. Fatrias, “Identification of Design Requirements for Ergonomic Long Spinal Board Using Quality Function Deployment (QFD),” Procedia Manuf., vol. 3, 2015.